The Dharma of Being Happy

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.6 | January 12, 2015 |

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Play (45 m 49 s)     Download (21 MB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

Next Life Meditations, Part-2

October 25, 2015 |

English; Nanda Gokulam, Telangana, India

Beyond Illusion, Stress, and Confusion

November 2, 2014 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Singaperumalkoil, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

About Srila Vyasadeva – Part 1

January 14, 2011 |

English; Dwaraka, Gujarat, India

Relaxed Bhakti

April 27, 2011 |

English;

Who and What is Supreme?

December 31, 2013 |

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Mahamrityunjaya mentions Lord Siva as Supreme

January 6, 2014 |

Question: In Rigveda(RV 7.59.12) is given the Mahamrtyunjaya mantra which states that Lord Siva can award liberation just as a gardener frees a ripened cucumber from its creeper. However Srila Prabhupada in Bhagavad-Gita As It Is very clearly states that Lord Siva is under the influence of maya so it is not possible for him to release the conditioned soul from the clutches of maya (Chap 7 Verse 15 purport). How can this be reconciled?

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Sanskrit and Bengali Pronunciation Part 1

|

English; Mayapur, West Bengal, India

Celebrating Srila Prabhupada's US Arrival

October 2, 2015 |

English;

About Srila Vyasadeva – Part 2

January 14, 2011 |

English; Dwaraka, Gujarat, India

Next Life Meditations, Part-3

October 26, 2015 |

English; Nanda Gokulam, Telangana, India

Is Everything Predecided?

November 28, 2011 |

Question: Krishna says in Bhagavad-gita that He knows past, present, and future. If everything is predecided then why we should try to get Krishna. In other words, if everything is already predecided then what is the point of trying to become Krishna conscious. When my time will come, then I will automatically become Krishna conscious.… Expand>

Question:

Krishna says in Bhagavad-gita that He knows past, present, and future. If everything is predecided then why we should try to get Krishna. In other words, if everything is already predecided then what is the point of trying to become Krishna conscious. When my time will come, then I will automatically become Krishna conscious. Before that, even if I would try still I can't become Krishna conscious because everything is already predecided, like Ramayana is written before Lord Rama descended. Please clarify my doubt.

^ Collapse

English;

The Pope's Ignorance

April 25, 2011 |

English; Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

How to See God

December 28, 2014 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, India

Engaging Propensities in Preaching

October 3, 2016 |

English; Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Bhutabhavya-bhavannathah, Pavanah, Pavanah, Analah

December 19, 2013 |

English; Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

  • Viṣṇu-sahasranāma 291-294

  • 35 m 56 s  |  16.5 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Is being out of Varnasrama a Disturbance to Society?

October 20, 2016 |

Question: Is varnasrama considered part of “sruti-smrti-puranadi-pancaratra-vidhim”? Speaking of myself, I really don’t fall in any asrama and of course varna is the lowest… Expand>

Question:

In the verse quoted by Rupa Gosvami,

sruti-smrti-puranadi-

pancaratra-vidhim vina

aikantiki harer bhaktir

utpatayaiva kalpate

Is varnasrama considered part of “sruti-smrti-puranadi-pancaratra-vidhim”? Speaking of myself, I really don’t fall in any asrama and of course varna is the lowest. Is any devotional service or other activities performed by me an unnecessary disturbance in society?

^ Collapse

English; Gauragrama, Telangana, India

Second-hand stool and staying in ISKCON

November 22, 2006 |

English; Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Krishna's Assuming Forms

August 28, 2012 |

Question: I would like to ask for clarification of one subject, namely, Krishna's "assuming" different forms. In one of the classes that had been uploaded on the bvks.com you spoke about the Lord not "assuming" the form, as far as I remember, you made the point that these forms of the Lord do exist eternally and that… Expand>

Question:

I would like to ask for clarification of one subject, namely, Krishna's "assuming" different forms. In one of the classes that had been uploaded on the bvks.com you spoke about the Lord not "assuming" the form, as far as I remember, you made the point that these forms of the Lord do exist eternally and that the forms of the material world are the "copies" and not the other way round. You also made the point that the word "assume" should probably not be used in the verse.

Today we were listening to the class by Srila Prabhupada and he also spoke on the topic and this is what he said:

"So sometimes this earthly planet was thrown into the water, Garbhodaka-samudra, Garbhodaka Sea, and God took the form of a boar, having two tusks — because it was easier. Just like shovel, you take something like that. So He took the earth. So that is described: ksitir iha vipulatare tisthati tava… No. What is that? Dasana-sikhare? The, this is described in Jayadeva's prayer. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna. Vasati, "is resting"; vasati dasana-sikhare, "on the top of the tusk." Kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa jaya jagadisa hare. So He's yajnesa. It is not that He's… is shape was just like hog, but He's not hog. Don't misunderstand. His shape was a gigantic hog. You can just imagine what kind of hog He was. The shape was like hog, but He was resting the whole planet, earthly planet, on the tusk. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna sasini kalanka, kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa. Here it is stated, saukaram. Saukaram means like hog. Not that He's hog. He's yajnesa. He can take any shape. Just like here is, God has assumed the shape of a lion, half-lion, half-man. So He's all powerful, He can take any shape, any form, but He is not that form. That is for the time being. For the time being, He assumes so many forms. The real form is Krsna, the original form. Kesava dhrta-sukara, sukara-rupa or sukara-rupa. "My Lord Kesava, You have assumed this form." So there are many millions and millions of forms of God. According to time, necessity, circumstances, He assumes different forms. Because it is His business:

yada yada hi dharmasya
glanir bhavati bharata
abhyutthanam adharmasya
tadatmanam srjamy aham
[Bg. 4.7]

He appears as soon as there are discrepancies in the methodical way."

>>> Ref. VedaBase => Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.3.7 — Los Angeles, September 13, 1972

I remember discussing this very same point with Gokula Candra Prabhu when we were in Salem, and the conclusion was that these forms do exist eternally, but from the above statement by Srila Prabhupada it seems to be otherwise. Could you clarify that please so that I may understand this properly?

^ Collapse

English;

Why Do People Choose ISKCON, Not Christianity?

June 26, 2011 |

Question: Why do many people from the Western world go to ISKCON instead of Christianity that is apart of the Western culture? Could you please explain this?

English;