Nityanand Katha

February 1, 2015 |

English with தமிழ் Translation; Perambur, Tamil Nadu, India

Play (49 m 18 s)     Download (22.6 MB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

Some Thoughts on Culture

March 16, 2016 |

English; Karumandurai, Tamil Nadu, India

Why I Shouted Last Time

December 12, 2010 |

English; Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Our Duty to Preach

September 5, 2015 |

English; London, England

Devotees are Treasure Hunters

August 1, 2006 |

English; Prague, Czech Republic

Talk To School Children

February 24, 2008 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Thirukkovil, Tamil Nadu, India

What Does It Stop Us Being Krsna Conscious?

May 21, 2011 |

Question: What is that which stops us from being Krishna conscious? Lot of people study Srila Prabhupada glorious books but they are still not able to make a difference in their life? What is that stop people from becoming fully Krishna conscious? Please help.… Expand>

Question:

What is that which stops us from being Krishna conscious? Lot of people study Srila Prabhupada glorious books but they are still not able to make a difference in their life? What is that stop people from becoming fully Krishna conscious? Please help.

Answer by HH Bhakti Vikāsa Swami:

Well, it’s the same question that Arjuna asked to Kṛṣṇa. 

atha kena prayukto ’yaṁ
pāpaṁ carati pūruṣaḥ
anicchann api vārṣṇeya
balād iva niyojitaḥ

Why do people perform sinful activities even against their wish, as if they are forced? Kṛṣṇa replied… What did he reply? What’s the next verse? All right, anyone else apart from… 

kāma eṣa krodha eṣa
rajo-guṇa-samudbhavaḥ
mahāśano mahā-pāpmā
viddhy enam iha vairiṇam

So far so good, they’re biting others, or maybe they’re listening to the lecture. Not very likely. So, Kṛṣṇa said that is because of material desire and anger… (Krodha generally means anger. That can mean frustration also. Frustration is another phase of anger.) …Which are born of rajo-guṇa, the mode of enjoyment of this material world, which burn like fire, which are highly sinful. One should know these to be the enemy. So it’s material desire. Ultimately, that’s our own desire, because of our own wrong desire. Why are we not Kṛṣṇa conscious? Because we don’t want to be, ultimately. Because we are rascals. So therefore, we have to take to the process of sādhana. This is a common question. Why aren’t we Kṛṣṇa conscious? We read the books. All right. We have a serious disease of not being Kṛṣṇa conscious. We have to take the medicine, but don’t expect it’s going to happen… One instant pill, you take one pill and everything finished. People, they advertise some medicine: “Guaranteed cure in seven days of all diseases”. You know it’s bogus. Guarantee: 35 000 rupees, worship some demigod and guaranteed all your problems solved. Bogus. So Kṛṣṇa consciousness is the cure, but take some time. Some patience is required. What stops us from becoming Kṛṣṇa conscious? Our own wrong desire that has to be rectified by regularly hearing and chanting about Kṛṣṇa, following the prescribed process.

^ Show less

English;

Atindriyah

September 28, 2012 |

English; Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

Devotees or Demons

July 20, 2017 |

English; Gauragrama, Telangana, India

Saintly Discussion of Sex

June 20, 2014 |

English; Mumbai, Maharastra, India

Krishna's Assuming Forms

August 28, 2012 |

Question: I would like to ask for clarification of one subject, namely, Krishna's "assuming" different forms. In one of the classes that had been uploaded on the bvks.com you spoke about the Lord not "assuming" the form, as far as I remember, you made the point that these forms of the Lord do exist eternally and that… Expand>

Question:

I would like to ask for clarification of one subject, namely, Krishna's "assuming" different forms. In one of the classes that had been uploaded on the bvks.com you spoke about the Lord not "assuming" the form, as far as I remember, you made the point that these forms of the Lord do exist eternally and that the forms of the material world are the "copies" and not the other way round. You also made the point that the word "assume" should probably not be used in the verse.

Today we were listening to the class by Srila Prabhupada and he also spoke on the topic and this is what he said:

"So sometimes this earthly planet was thrown into the water, Garbhodaka-samudra, Garbhodaka Sea, and God took the form of a boar, having two tusks — because it was easier. Just like shovel, you take something like that. So He took the earth. So that is described: ksitir iha vipulatare tisthati tava… No. What is that? Dasana-sikhare? The, this is described in Jayadeva's prayer. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna. Vasati, "is resting"; vasati dasana-sikhare, "on the top of the tusk." Kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa jaya jagadisa hare. So He's yajnesa. It is not that He's… is shape was just like hog, but He's not hog. Don't misunderstand. His shape was a gigantic hog. You can just imagine what kind of hog He was. The shape was like hog, but He was resting the whole planet, earthly planet, on the tusk. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna sasini kalanka, kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa. Here it is stated, saukaram. Saukaram means like hog. Not that He's hog. He's yajnesa. He can take any shape. Just like here is, God has assumed the shape of a lion, half-lion, half-man. So He's all powerful, He can take any shape, any form, but He is not that form. That is for the time being. For the time being, He assumes so many forms. The real form is Krsna, the original form. Kesava dhrta-sukara, sukara-rupa or sukara-rupa. "My Lord Kesava, You have assumed this form." So there are many millions and millions of forms of God. According to time, necessity, circumstances, He assumes different forms. Because it is His business:

yada yada hi dharmasya
glanir bhavati bharata
abhyutthanam adharmasya
tadatmanam srjamy aham
[Bg. 4.7]

He appears as soon as there are discrepancies in the methodical way."

>>> Ref. VedaBase => Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.3.7 — Los Angeles, September 13, 1972

I remember discussing this very same point with Gokula Candra Prabhu when we were in Salem, and the conclusion was that these forms do exist eternally, but from the above statement by Srila Prabhupada it seems to be otherwise. Could you clarify that please so that I may understand this properly?

^ Show less

English;

Differences and Similarities Between Mayavadis and Vaisnavas

July 20, 2014 |

English with Русский translation; Dobromysh, Tatarstan, Russia

Simplicity required for Grhasthas also

January 20, 2016 |

English; Somnath, Gujarat, India

Guru-tattva – The Required Understanding

August 30, 2015 |

English; Inis Rath, Northern Ireland, UK

Happy New Year, Foolish Materialists

December 31, 2016 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Kutralam, Tamil Nadu, India

Caitanya Mahaprabhu is Most Merciful

March 8, 2012 |

English;

Felicitating Book Distributors

January 7, 2018 |

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Did the Jiva Fall from the Spiritual World?

August 30, 2016 |

Question: A.) What is meant by acala? Some say that it means that the jiva is immovable in the body. Others say that it means that the jiva never leaves the spiritual world. B.) Does the jiva actually fall down into the material world or he remains in the spiritual one? Is he mechanically moved or it is just an illusion? i.) I cannot understand how the jiva is simultaneously situated both in the material and spiritual worlds. ii.) If in the material world the jiva turns away from Krsna, what does he do in the spiritual world at the same time? iii.) What does it mean that the jiva does not fall if he really falls down?… Expand>

Question:

Regading jiva's fall into this material world. Srila Prabhupada talks a lot about the fall. One devotee discovered a transcribed lecture of Srila Prabhupada on Srimad Bhagavatam 2.9.1 delivered in Tokio on April 22nd, 1972 (https://old.prabhupadavani.org/main/Bhagavatam/325.html ) in which he says that the jiva does not fall down. The devotee suggested that the jiva remains in the spiritual world but his consciousness is placed into the material world (as in a dream when one is asleep and is dreaming about visiting different countries and performing various activities). He supports his statement by citing BG in which it is said that the jiva is immovable (acala). Thus, he says it is situated in the spiritual world. So my questions are:

A.) What is meant by acala? Some say that it means that the jiva is immovable in the body. Others say that it means that the jiva never leaves the spiritual world.

B.) Does the jiva actually fall down into the material world or he remains in the spiritual world? Is he mechanically moved or it is just an illusion?

i.) I cannot understand how the jiva is simultaneously situated both in the material and spiritual worlds.
ii.) If in the material world the jiva turns away from Krsna, what does he do in the spiritual world at the same time?
iii.) What does it mean that the jiva does not fall if he really falls down?

 

^ Show less

English with Český translation; Brno, Czech Republic

Where There Is Calculation There Is No Love

January 11, 2000 |

English with తెలుగు translation; Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

Why Maharsis and Demigods Can't Understand Krsna

December 25, 2005 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Rama Katha

April 12, 2011 |

English; Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India