Tvasta, Stavistha, Dhruva Govindadvipa

Viṣṇu-sahasranāma 52-55 | July 8, 2012 |

English; Northern Ireland, UK

Play (33 m 42 s)     Download (15.4 MB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

Indebtedness to Parents

July 3, 2015 |

Question: 1. Why does Krishna say here that one cannot repay his debt to his parents even if he serves them for a full lifetime of a hundred years when in S.B 11.5.4 Narada muni says to Vasudeva–“One who has taken shelter of Krishna’s lotus feet, is not indebted to demigods, great sages, ordinary living beings, relatives, friends, mankind or even one’s forefathers who have passed away.” So how are we to understand this statement and how should we take this comment in SB 10.45.5?… Expand>

Question:

sarvārtha-sambhavodeho

janitaḥpoṣitoyataḥ

natayoryātinirveśaṁ

pitrormartyaḥśatāyuṣā

Translation: With one’s body one can acquire all goals of life, and it is one’s parents who give the body birth and sustenance. Therefore no mortal man can repay his debt to his parents, even if he serves them for a full lifetime of a hundred years. (S.B.10.45.5).

Questions:

1. Why does Krishna say here that one cannot repay his debt to his parents even if he serves them for a full lifetime of a hundred years when in S.B 11.5.4 Narada muni says to Vasudeva–“One who has taken shelter of Krishna’s lotus feet, is not indebted to demigods, great sages, ordinary living beings, relatives, friends, mankind or even one’s forefathers who have passed away.” So how are we to understand this statement and how should we take this comment in SB 10.45.5?

2. Is this comment applicable to only a Krishna conscious father and mother or a materialistic father & mother also?

 

ANSWER BY HH Bhakti Vikāsa Swami:

"All right. Karttik Kumar form Bangalore is quoting Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.45.5, spoken by Kṛṣṇa.

sarvārtha-sambhavo deho
janitaḥ poṣito yataḥ
na tayor yāti nirveśaṁ
pitror martyaḥ śatāyuṣā

Translation: With one’s body one can acquire all goals of life, and it is one’s parents who give the body birth and sustenance. Therefore no mortal man can repay his debt to his parents, even if he serves them for a full lifetime of a hundred years.

So there’s that verse which Śrīla Prabhupāda quotes three times, I believe, in Bhagavad-gītā As It Is. Because Arjuna’s whole proposition was not to go against the family.

devarṣi-bhūtāpta-nṛṇāṁ pitṝṇāṁ
na kiṅkaro nāyam ṛṇī ca rājan
sarvātmanā yaḥ śaraṇaṁ śaraṇyaṁ
gato mukundaṁ parihṛtya kartam

O King, one who has given up all material duties and has taken full shelter of the lotus feet of Mukunda, who offers shelter to all, is not indebted to the demigods, great sages, ordinary living beings, relatives, friends, mankind or even one's forefathers who have passed away. Since all such classes of living entities are part and parcel of the Supreme Lord, one who has surrendered to the Lord's service has no need to serve such persons separately. (SB 11.5.41.)

So this appears to be contradictory because Kṛṣṇa says you can’t repay your debt to your parents, even if you serve them for a full lifetime of a hundred years. But then Kṛṣṇa says: “If you take shelter of Me, then you are not indebted.”

Well, one statement is qualified by another. This is common – that (there is a) general truth, (and) there are exceptions. Sri Lankans are good people. OK, we can accept that as a general proposition. Well, this one is not good - some of them are not good. So it’s a general case, but it’s qualified.

Actually, one can repay the debts. One repays the debts to the parents by having children. That’s the understanding. So the children, they will offer pinda to the Pitris.

DEBT TO THE PARENTS
What is the debt to the parent? - That you were given a body by them. So you can’t exactly repay, but you create more bodies. So there is a way to repay, but the mood of this is that what you were given is so valuable that we feel we can’t repay. We shouldn’t think: “OK, I repaid them, and then leave them alone, forget them.” That’s the idea. Gratefulness should be there.

sarvārtha-sambhavo deho
Everything we want to do, that can be done through the body. If you don’t have a body, you can’t do anything. If you are a ghost, for instance. If you are born in a subhuman body, then one cannot achieve the goal of life. So therefore, the human form of life is very valuable. But, if we fully dedicate to Kṛṣṇa, then we become free from the ordinary method of repaying the debt to the parents because we actually benefit not only the parents but even previous generation and even forthcoming generations. Kṛṣṇa delivers them all.

So therefore, one is not a debtor if he takes full shelter of Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa takes care of all, the parents and everyone else. So the general case is that one cannot repay the debt to the parents. And of course, that’s very much part of Indian culture, especially in North India very well-known this story… What’s his name? Kumara Sampat, Sampat Kumar; what is it? Śravan Kumar. Very common picture to see him carrying, on his shoulder, the father and mother.

MATERIALISTIC PARENTS
So, question number two. In one sense it is more applicable to materialistic father and mother. Inasmuch as, by Kṛṣṇa consciousness you repay the debt. Of course, you shouldn’t think that: “Well, (it) doesn’t matter about my parents.” A child in Kṛṣṇa consciousness shouldn’t be neglectful of parents. But, (one) may also, if one is fully engaged in preaching Kṛṣṇa consciousness, then (he) may not marry and look after the parents in old age. But it should be seen that someone looks after them - some arrangement is made - something is done. In Kṛṣṇa consciousness we shouldn’t take it as an excuse to neglect our parents."

^ Show less

English; Colombo, Sri Lanka

Becoming a Business Tycoon to Serve Krishna

February 27, 2012 |

Question: If a devotee runs his business with the attitude that he wants to make millions of pounds to propogate the Hare Krishna movement, Is it Bhakti? Also, if he prays Krishna to empower him to become the world's leading business tycoon so that he will share a part of his profit to open prasadam resturants/Prabhupada bookstores (shops with… Expand>

Question:

If a devotee runs his business with the attitude that he wants to make millions of pounds to propogate the Hare Krishna movement, Is it Bhakti?

Also, if he prays Krishna to empower him to become the world's leading business tycoon so that he will share a part of his profit to open prasadam resturants/Prabhupada bookstores (shops with Prabhupada's books) etc., would it be OK to pray?

Above all, I would imagine that setting an example (simple leaving and high thinking) as a leading businessman is a good thing. Is it correct? 

^ Show less

English;

Naikakarmakrt, Part-3

April 16, 2016 |

English; Srirangam, Tamil Nadu, India

Perfect Philosophy, Practice, and Lifestyle

September 26, 2014 |

English;

Heart, Not Mind

September 7, 2012 |

English; Dallas, Texas, USA

  • Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta 2.3.137

  • 1 h 24 m  |  38.5 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Bhagavad-gita in Two Lines

December 7, 2013 |

English with తెలుగు translation; Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India

Condemn Modern Civilization, But Use Modern Amenities

August 29, 2011 |

Question: My question is that Srila Prabhupad used to blaspheme for all new developments but we are utilizing all the modern items for our day to day use nowadays like — staying in a big building, travelling through airplane, using modern equipments for our health… how we do counteract when people ask that one way you are condemning modern civilization but in other than you are using the modern utilities…

English;

Visvasrg, Visvabhugvibhu

August 6, 2013 |

English; Lika, Croatia

When a Guru Deviates

September 27, 2011 |

Question: If a disciple is seeing that the guru is deviating from the original path and not following the words of Srila Prabhupada (for e.g. by promoting philanthropic activities), then what is the duty of the disciple and who should correct the guru? And, if at all, a disciple thinks that the guru is deviating, is it an offence towards his guru?

English;

Next Life Meditations, Part-3

October 26, 2015 |

English; Nanda Gokulam, Telangana, India

Vira

October 31, 2014 |

English;

Is Chanting Only Countable for Initiated Devotees?

June 7, 2011 |

Question: Few years back, at ISKCON Yamunanagar temple in Haryana, India, I attended a lecture by a devotee from ISKCON Delhi who was on guest visit. When asked about the importance of initiation in chanting, he told that without being initiated, our chanting the rounds is nearly ineffective. Only after initiation from spiritual master does… Expand>

Question:

Few years back, at ISKCON Yamunanagar temple in Haryana, India, I attended a lecture by a devotee from ISKCON Delhi who was on guest visit. When asked about the importance of initiation in chanting, he told that without being initiated, our chanting the rounds is nearly ineffective. Only after initiation from spiritual master does our real chanting begins. He gave an analogy that without being initiated, our 64 rounds of chanting will hardly equal 16 rounds of an initiated person. Since then my interest in chanting has been flickering and I feel there is no use to chant if it doesn't count at all. And I do not thing I am qualified to be initiated now or ever in my life. Though I may chant sometimes, but in deep core of heart, these words discourage me every time. Please help.

^ Show less

English;

First Lesson in Spirituality: Defining Spirit

September 2, 2012 |

English; Denver, Colorado, USA

What Can Repression Accomplish

August 8, 2013 |

English; Lika, Croatia

The Attractiveness of Srila Prabhupada, Part-7

August 26, 2014 |

English; Govindadvipa, Ireland

The Challenge of Scientism, Part-3

August 8, 2014 |

English; Lika, Croatia

Dharmakrt

August 19, 2016 |

English; Inish Rath, Ireland

Srimad-Bhagavatam is not Just Stories

October 6, 2015 |

English; Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

On Yajna and Sankirtana-yajna

September 28, 2005 |

English; Los Angeles, California, USA

Why Do Bad Things Happen to Good People?

May 6, 2011 |

Question: My question is why do bad things happen with good people or innocent people?… Expand>

Question:

My question is why do bad things happen with good people or innocent people?

Answer by HH Bhakti Vikāśa Swami:

An often asked question. The problem of evil. If God is good, then why do bad things happen to good people?

Well, the answer is that no one is good in this material world. The so-called good person who is suffering, is suffering because of reactions to sinful activities performed in previous lives.

Maybe someone who is bad is getting good luck — lots of money, but that means they did some pious activities in previous lives. Now they’ve got opportunity they are taking advantage and exploiting others. That cycle goes on. The good people are good as a result of their pious activities, they get the opportunity to enjoy this world, and they exploit others and then get sinful reactions, and it goes on like this.

There is an article about this called ’’Why Do Bad Things Happen to Good People“ by Ravīndra-svarūpa Prabhu. It was featured in Back to Godhead magazine many years ago. That is accessible from The Bhaktivedanta Vedabase. If you don’t have access to that, you can ask someone. It examines this in detail.

http://www.krishna.com/do-bad-things-happen-good-people

But in the modern age someone may be polite and well behaved, but people are eating meat and watching TV — which is all sinful.

Who is good? What is the meaning of good? We think someone is good because they stroke their pet dog, they look after their pet dog very nicely. Good means to surrender to Kṛṣṇa.

 

 

 

 

 

^ Show less

English;