About Srila Vyasadeva – Part 1

January 14, 2011 |

English; Dwarka, Gujarat, India

Play (1 h 5 m)     Download (11.2 MB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

Recognising One's Conditioning

January 14, 2018 |

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

About Vyasa-puja

January 15, 2011 |

English; Dwarka, Gujarat, India

Are Acaryas Eternally Perfect?

May 18, 2017 |

English; Mayapur, West Bengal, India

Bhakti is Independent and Supreme, Part-5

March 13, 2016 |

English; Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

The Inconceivable Boar Incarnation

February 19, 2016 |

English; Gaura-grama, Yadagirigutta, Telangana, India

Eight Aspects of Brahmacarya

August 24, 2012 |

English; Los Angeles, California, USA

Important and Unimportant

August 9, 2014 |

English; Lika, Croatia

Navigating ISKCON's Multiculturalism

October 24, 2013 |

English; Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

The Quality of Forgiveness

July 21, 2014 |

English with Русский translation; Dobromysh, Tatarstan, Russia

Krishna's Assuming Forms

August 28, 2012 |

Question: I would like to ask for clarification of one subject, namely, Krishna's "assuming" different forms. In one of the classes that had been uploaded on the bvks.com you spoke about the Lord not "assuming" the form, as far as I remember, you made the point that these forms of the Lord do exist eternally and that… Expand>

Question:

I would like to ask for clarification of one subject, namely, Krishna's "assuming" different forms. In one of the classes that had been uploaded on the bvks.com you spoke about the Lord not "assuming" the form, as far as I remember, you made the point that these forms of the Lord do exist eternally and that the forms of the material world are the "copies" and not the other way round. You also made the point that the word "assume" should probably not be used in the verse.

Today we were listening to the class by Srila Prabhupada and he also spoke on the topic and this is what he said:

"So sometimes this earthly planet was thrown into the water, Garbhodaka-samudra, Garbhodaka Sea, and God took the form of a boar, having two tusks — because it was easier. Just like shovel, you take something like that. So He took the earth. So that is described: ksitir iha vipulatare tisthati tava… No. What is that? Dasana-sikhare? The, this is described in Jayadeva's prayer. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna. Vasati, "is resting"; vasati dasana-sikhare, "on the top of the tusk." Kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa jaya jagadisa hare. So He's yajnesa. It is not that He's… is shape was just like hog, but He's not hog. Don't misunderstand. His shape was a gigantic hog. You can just imagine what kind of hog He was. The shape was like hog, but He was resting the whole planet, earthly planet, on the tusk. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna sasini kalanka, kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa. Here it is stated, saukaram. Saukaram means like hog. Not that He's hog. He's yajnesa. He can take any shape. Just like here is, God has assumed the shape of a lion, half-lion, half-man. So He's all powerful, He can take any shape, any form, but He is not that form. That is for the time being. For the time being, He assumes so many forms. The real form is Krsna, the original form. Kesava dhrta-sukara, sukara-rupa or sukara-rupa. "My Lord Kesava, You have assumed this form." So there are many millions and millions of forms of God. According to time, necessity, circumstances, He assumes different forms. Because it is His business:

yada yada hi dharmasya
glanir bhavati bharata
abhyutthanam adharmasya
tadatmanam srjamy aham
[Bg. 4.7]

He appears as soon as there are discrepancies in the methodical way."

>>> Ref. VedaBase => Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.3.7 — Los Angeles, September 13, 1972

I remember discussing this very same point with Gokula Candra Prabhu when we were in Salem, and the conclusion was that these forms do exist eternally, but from the above statement by Srila Prabhupada it seems to be otherwise. Could you clarify that please so that I may understand this properly?

^ Show less

English;

Appreciating the Infinite

February 8, 2014 |

English; Colombo, Sri Lanka

Crying Upon Seeing the Lord

April 4, 2011 |

Question: Many times when I see the lord's deity or when I explain about krishna to some one having darshan of Jagannathji on seeing Srila Prabhupada I start crying I feel a different experience, I am not chanting sincerely but most of the time thinking of lord or ideas for serving. Crying does not happen always but some times Maharaj what is the reason of this?

English;

The Attractiveness of Srila Prabhupada, Part-4

August 23, 2014 |

English; Govindadvipa, Ireland

Dharmakrt - Accusations Against Krsna, Part-1

August 20, 2016 |

English; Inish Rath, Ireland

You're in Maya, Prabhu

August 28, 2015 |

English; Inis Rath, Northern Ireland, UK

Message for Devotees

August 27, 2016 |

English with Český translation; Brno, Czech Republic

Intelligent Balance in Bhakti

June 11, 2008 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Urjita, Atindra, Sangraha

September 13, 2012 |

English; Dallas, Texas, USA

  • Viṣṇu-sahasranāma 158-160

  • 37 m 29 s  |  17.2 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Vedas Mention Purusha As the Source

May 21, 2011 |

Question: If Krishna is the source of all incarnations why include him in the list of incarnations in the first place? And why does Bhagavata say that in the “beginning” Purusha form was there? In fact Vedas use the word “Purusha” to signify the Godhead. In the Purusha Sookta (the Creation Hymn) it is said that the Purusha creates… Expand>

Question:

If Krishna is the source of all incarnations why include him in the list of incarnations in the first place? And why does Bhagavata say that in the “beginning” Purusha form was there? In fact Vedas use the word “Purusha” to signify the Godhead. In the Purusha Sookta (the Creation Hymn) it is said that the Purusha creates this world. We come to know that he is Vishnu since it is mentioned that Laskhmi is his consort (hreeshcha te lakshmeeshcha patnyau). Why don’t Vedas say Krishna is the root, and Radha is his consort? Why “Purusha” and his consort is “Lakshmi”?

^ Show less

English;

Why Sayujya is Considered As One Kind of Mukti

July 28, 2012 |

Question: The goal of a Gaudiya Vaishnava is "Prema Bhakti", but out of the 5 types of mukti, for sayujya-mukti—we use the pramana “aruhya krccrena param padam tatha, patanty adho anadrta yusmad anghrayah” (Srimad Bhagavatam 10.2.32) to provide evidence that sayuja-mukti is not a permanent type of mukti. If this is the case, why is… Expand>

Question:

The goal of a Gaudiya Vaishnava is "Prema Bhakti", but out of the 5 types of mukti, for sayujya-mukti—we  use the pramana “aruhya krccrena param padam tatha, patanty adho anadrta yusmad anghrayah” (Srimad Bhagavatam 10.2.32) to provide evidence that sayuja-mukti is not a permanent type of mukti. If this is the case, why is it considered one of the types of mukti? My understanding of “mukti” here is based on the definition from Bhagavat 2.10.6 – muktir hitva anyatha rupam svarupena vyavasthitih.

^ Show less

English;