Krishna is Not Mentioned in the Scriptures Prior to His Appearance

ASK BVKS | August 2, 2011 |

English;

Question:

If Krishna is the original form of the supreme personality of Godhead, why is that there was no mention of his name and form as Krishna in the scriptures prior to his appearance, like the Ramayana and the Vedas. why is the lord referred to as Narayana and not as Krishna? I would be glad if you could clarify this doubt which has arisen in this sinful mind.

Audio answer:

Play (3 m 59 s)     Download (937.9 KB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

Maha-makhah, Nakshatra-nemih, Nakshatri, Kshamah

October 22, 2015 |

English; Nanda Gokulam, Telangana, India

  • Viṣṇu-sahasranāma 440-443

  • 59 m 33 s  |  27.3 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Demons Dressed as Devotees

November 3, 2015 |

English; Nanda Gokulam, Telangana, India

Questions and Answers Session

November 2, 2015 |

English; Nanda Gokulam, Telangana, India

Promoting Gurukula in America

July 28, 2011 |

Question: I have been teaching in ISKCON schools in the USA for the past 30 yrs. Some of these schools (in the past) had boys' ashrams, which I believe is a good thing provided there are qualified teachers. Most (if not all) of the present ISKCON schools in America are day schools. Do you think ashrams or gurukulas will ever be revived here in America in the near future? What can those of us who still believe in that system do to promote the idea?

English;

Perfection of Religion, Part-2

February 5, 2015 |

English; Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India

Sannyasa and Sannyasis

September 13, 2004 |

English; Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

  • Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.6.12-13

  • 34 m 10 s  |  15.6 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Bhagavada-gita Radha Nectar

August 29, 2017 |

English; Udupi, Karnataka, India

Vyasa's despondency

July 1, 2016 |

English; Navsari, Gujarat, India

The Cause of Suffering

June 18, 2011 |

English; Laguna Beach, California, USA

Standards of Cooking for Deities and Pictures

May 1, 2016 |

Question: As far as cooking prasada for the deities, the standard as I know is to be second initiated. Does this apply to cooking for the devotees and offering it to a picture? In Krishna house they have devotees cooking who chant 8 rounds and its questionable if they are following the regulated principles. Would this affect one's consciousness and can this be considered a fit offering to the Lord?… Expand>

Question:

As far as cooking prasada for the deities, the standard as I know is to be second initiated. Does this apply to cooking for the devotees and offering it to a picture? In Krishna house they have devotees cooking who chant 8 rounds and its questionable if they are following the regulated principles. Would this affect one's consciousness and can this be considered a fit offering to the Lord?

Answer by H.H. Bhakti Vikāśa Swami:

Well, the proper term in our terminology is to prepare bhoga for the Deities. It is offered, the Lord accepts it, and then we take His prasādam.
Yes, but that’s the strict rule that in the temple where Deities are worshipped, all cooking and Deity worship should be done by brāhmaṇ initiated devotees.
That doesn’t mean that if you are not brāhmaṇicaly initiated you should not eat, or just only eat raw food or something like that. Even that, you are supposed to offer to Kṛṣṇa.
There is laxity for some devotees who are not initiated in that way. But in the temples with installed Deities (of course Deity means installed) there bhoga should be offered and cooked by persons who are formally initiated brāhmaṇically or pañcarātrically.
If they are not chanting 16 rounds and following the principles, then they shouldn’t be cooking for Deities and they will affect our consciousness.

viṣayīra anna khāile malina haya mana
malina mana haile nahe kṛṣṇera smaraṇa

“When one eats food offered by a materialistic man, one’s mind becomes contaminated, and when the mind is contaminated, one is unable to think of Kṛṣṇa properly.“ (CC Antya 6.278)

Then we may say they are devotees, not materialists. They are not devotees to the level who should be cooking for distribution to others. They won’t benefit others. I’ve spoken on this many times. You can see on the website, there must be.
It affects one’s consciousness certainly because the consciousness of the cook is transmitted through the cooking.

Once, in Australia, Śrīla Prabhupāda was given some prasādam, nicely puffed up purīs. Afterward he asked: Who is the cook? The cook was Kūrma dāsa Prabhu, one of the most famous cooks in the history of ISKCON.
There are some famous cooks: Yamunā devi (who is probably the most famous), Kūrma Prabhu, Apūrva is very well known in America, Vibhu-Caitanya was there in Vṛndāvan. There are so many good cooks, but some in particular.
So Kūrma Prabhu came and Śrīla Prabhupāda said to him: Thank you very much for so nicely following the regulative principles!
We may say what’s that got to do with cooking, but Śrīla Prabhupāda could understand that his cooking is so nice because he is so seriously practicing Kṛṣṇa consciousness, and Rādhārāṇī is manifesting through him. It’s understood that cooking for Kṛṣṇa is the service of Rādhārāṇī.

rādhikāra pakka anna vividha byañjana
parama ānande kṛṣṇa korena bhojana

“In great ecstasy and joy Kṛṣṇa eats the rice, curried vegetables, sweets, and pastries cooked by Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī.” (Bhoga-arati / Bhaja Bhakata Vatsala, verse 8)

As Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura says She cooks for Kṛṣṇa rice and various vegetables, and so many different preparations.

And in South India they don’t know so much about Rādhā yet. So, they will say that Lakṣmī is cooking actually. Cooking for Viṣṇu means that the cook has to take blessing from Lakṣmī. It’s Her service, so the cook can only assist.

So, when one is in good consciousness then Kṛṣṇa is very pleased to accept the offering, and His mercy comes through fully.

If we are in materialistic consciousness, if we are not following the principles properly, if we are not up to the level of chanting 16 rounds, well, whatever good consciousness we have it will come through, and whatever bad consciousness we have it will come through also.
So, that’s the one in brief.

^ Show less

English; Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Bhaktisiddhanta-vani is the Truth

August 21, 2015 |

English; Crawley, England

Debate – Love, Success, aur Dhoka

April 4, 2015 |

English; Delhi, India

The Implications of Spiritual Knowledge

May 23, 2011 |

English; Dublin, Ireland

Comparing Daksa and Dhruva

May 4, 2008 |

English; Mumbai, Maharastra, India

Repackaged Kirtan

January 4, 2014 |

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Entering the Caitanya Ocean

March 4, 2012 |

English; Valsad, Gujarat, India

Why Does ISKCON Do Not Accept Evolution Theory?

August 3, 2011 |

Question: I have a question and I would be grateful should you be able to answer it for me. Why does ISKCON not accept Evolution which has withstood criticism for over 150 years? I have read some of the works of Cremo & Thompson yet I cannot but be surprised at how evolution is not accepted within ISKCON?

English;

Detachment as a Precursor for Prema

November 8, 2013 |

English; Vrindavan, Uttar Pradesh, India

Further Symptoms of Ecstatic Love

February 7, 2011 |

English; Valsad, Gujarat, India

  • Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta 2.23.18-19

  • 56 m 21 s  |  12.9 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Clarity in Spiritual Understanding

November 6, 2015 |

English; Hyderabad, Telangana, India