Krishna's Assuming Forms

ASK BVKS | August 28, 2012 |

English;

Question:

I would like to ask for clarification of one subject, namely, Krishna's "assuming" different forms. In one of the classes that had been uploaded on the bvks.com you spoke about the Lord not "assuming" the form, as far as I remember, you made the point that these forms of the Lord do exist eternally and that the forms of the material world are the "copies" and not the other way round. You also made the point that the word "assume" should probably not be used in the verse.

Today we were listening to the class by Srila Prabhupada and he also spoke on the topic and this is what he said:

"So sometimes this earthly planet was thrown into the water, Garbhodaka-samudra, Garbhodaka Sea, and God took the form of a boar, having two tusks — because it was easier. Just like shovel, you take something like that. So He took the earth. So that is described: ksitir iha vipulatare tisthati tava… No. What is that? Dasana-sikhare? The, this is described in Jayadeva's prayer. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna. Vasati, "is resting"; vasati dasana-sikhare, "on the top of the tusk." Kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa jaya jagadisa hare. So He's yajnesa. It is not that He's… is shape was just like hog, but He's not hog. Don't misunderstand. His shape was a gigantic hog. You can just imagine what kind of hog He was. The shape was like hog, but He was resting the whole planet, earthly planet, on the tusk. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna sasini kalanka, kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa. Here it is stated, saukaram. Saukaram means like hog. Not that He's hog. He's yajnesa. He can take any shape. Just like here is, God has assumed the shape of a lion, half-lion, half-man. So He's all powerful, He can take any shape, any form, but He is not that form. That is for the time being. For the time being, He assumes so many forms. The real form is Krsna, the original form. Kesava dhrta-sukara, sukara-rupa or sukara-rupa. "My Lord Kesava, You have assumed this form." So there are many millions and millions of forms of God. According to time, necessity, circumstances, He assumes different forms. Because it is His business:

yada yada hi dharmasya
glanir bhavati bharata
abhyutthanam adharmasya
tadatmanam srjamy aham
[Bg. 4.7]

He appears as soon as there are discrepancies in the methodical way."

>>> Ref. VedaBase => Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.3.7 — Los Angeles, September 13, 1972

I remember discussing this very same point with Gokula Candra Prabhu when we were in Salem, and the conclusion was that these forms do exist eternally, but from the above statement by Srila Prabhupada it seems to be otherwise. Could you clarify that please so that I may understand this properly?

Audio answer:

Play (9 m 56 s)     Download (9.1 MB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

Address to Gauragrama Donors

August 6, 2017 |

English; Gauragrama, Telangana, India

Yasomati nandana

February 20, 2016 |

English; Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Why You Should Be Like Us

November 13, 2011 |

English; Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India

Bhaktivinoda's Lamentation, Part-3, Gopinath mama nivedana suno

November 17, 2016 |

English; Mayapur, West Bengal, India

Beyond Harmful Religion

September 27, 2013 |

English; King Cross, London, England

The Attractiveness of Srila Prabhupada, Part-6

August 25, 2014 |

English; Govindadvipa, Ireland

Introductory Lecture

February 23, 2008 |

English; Batticaloa, Sri Lanka

Pure Kirtan

April 10, 2011 |

English; Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Gopinatha, Bhajan with Explanation

August 23, 2017 |

English; Udupi, Karnataka, India

The Value of Devotee Association

September 7, 2014 |

English; Manchester, England

Caitanya Mahaprabhu is Most Merciful

March 8, 2012 |

English;

Sanskrit and Bengali Pronunciation Part 2

|

English; Mayapur, West Bengal, India

Rantideva's Unlikely Perfection

August 21, 2008 |

English; London, UK

Can Christianity be Accepted as a Part of Vaisnava Life?

October 31, 2013 |

Question: How has Christianity come to be accepted as part of Vaishnava life? There are several devotees I know who also claim to be Christians, how can this be? I do not see how these two can go together since they worship different gods. The biblical father god encouraged blood offerings for sin, that is NOT Krishna consciousness or at least not as I see it. I may be wrong about this so I decided to write to you for an answer.

English; Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Why The Lord Need to Put Tilak

January 9, 2014 |

Question: Why is it necessary for The Lord to put on tilak? Tilak is a symbol of The Lord's lotus feet and Tulasi, so why is Krsna also wearing tilak like us. Is there any sasta praman of Krsna's tilak in the scriptures. If he is wearing tilak just as a decoration then why is he wearing it in the same way as we wear it.

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Real Spiritual Life Begins with Real Spiritual Knowledge

December 21, 2013 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Arani, Tamil Nadu, India

Somewhat Divine Demons

November 5, 2015 |

English; Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Krodhaha, Krodhakrut, Karta, Visvabahuh, Mahidharah

March 2, 2014 |

English; Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

  • Viṣṇu-sahasranāma 315-319

  • 31 m 42 s  |  14.5 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Just Wait a Few Days

June 8, 2011 |

Question: I've one particular doubt regarding criticizing of Bogus gurus, sadhus etc. Whether a devotee should criticize and speak harshly about such scruplous persons in the community of devotees or not? Some devotees say that its better to stay away from criticizing anyone. They say that gradually that will lead one to the platform of criticizing devotees. Is it true? Is… Expand>

Question:

I've one particular doubt regarding criticizing of Bogus gurus, sadhus etc. Whether a devotee should criticize and speak harshly about such scruplous persons in the community of devotees or not? Some devotees say that its better to stay away from criticizing anyone. They say that gradually that will lead one to the platform of criticizing devotees. Is it true? Is it so that if a devotee (of any level) doesn't criticize such persons, he is supporting them or he's soft hearted? Does criticizing such persons help us Advancing in Bhakti? Can Kanishtas do this? I'm confused and need Some guidance maharaj.

^ Show less

English;

Can Devotees Worship Ganesa?

August 30, 2016 |

Question: One should begin the worship of the demigod Ganapati, who drives away all impediments in the execution of devotional service. In the Brahma-samhita it is stated that Ganapati worships the lotus feet of Lord Nrsimha-deva and in that way has become auspicious for the devotees in clearing out all impediments. Therefore, all devotees should worship Ganapati. Thus my neighbours placed Ganesha next to Nrsimhadeva on the altar. Other devotees cite Srila Prabhupada letters in which he says that there's no need to worship Ganesha. So what is the proper understanding?… Expand>

Question:

I saw a murti of Ganesh on the altar next to Nrsimhadeva at a neighbours' place. There was an argument between devotees. Some say that in Srila Prabhupada's Nectar of Devotion it is said in Chapter 8, One should begin the worship of the demigod Ganapati, who drives away all impediments in the execution of devotional service. In the Brahma-samhita it is stated that Ganapati worships the lotus feet of Lord Nrsimha-deva and in that way has become auspicious for the devotees in clearing out all impediments. Therefore, all devotees should worship Ganapati. Thus my neighbours placed Ganesha next to Nrsimhadeva on the altar. Other devotees cite Srila Prabhupada letters in which he says that there's no need to worship Ganesha. So what is the proper understanding?

^ Show less

English with Český translation; Brno, Czech Republic