Is Everything Predecided?

ASK BVKS | November 28, 2011 |

English;

Question:

Krishna says in Bhagavad-gita that He knows past, present, and future. If everything is predecided then why we should try to get Krishna. In other words, if everything is already predecided then what is the point of trying to become Krishna conscious. When my time will come, then I will automatically become Krishna conscious. Before that, even if I would try still I can't become Krishna conscious because everything is already predecided, like Ramayana is written before Lord Rama descended. Please clarify my doubt.

Audio answer:

Play (4 m 1 s)     Download (3.7 MB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

Miscarriages and Misconceptions

October 3, 2011 |

English; Valsad, Gujarat, India

Smartphones for Brahmacaris

October 5, 2014 |

English; Nanda Gokulam, Telangana, India

How to See God

December 21, 2014 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Karur, Tamil Nadu, India

Bhakti is Independent and Supreme, Part-5

March 13, 2016 |

English; Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Happiness for Elderly Devotees

January 27, 2017 |

English; Srirangam, Tamil Nadu, India

Turn a Wine Drinker Into a Devotee

June 21, 2005 |

English with తెలుగు translation; Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

Stick Close to Prabhupada

July 12, 1997 |

English; Zagreb, Croatia

Doing Things the American Way

April 29, 2017 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Sriperumbudur, Tamil Nadu, India

Sad Goswami Astaka

June 24, 2016 |

English; Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India

Pramodanah, Anandah, Nandanah, Nandah

January 10, 2017 |

English; Kutralam, Tamil Nadu, India

  • Viṣṇu-sahasranāma 528-531

  • 37 m 51 s  |  17.3 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Celebrating Srila Prabhupada's US Arrival

October 2, 2015 |

English;

Why Sayujya is Considered As One Kind of Mukti

July 28, 2012 |

Question: The goal of a Gaudiya Vaishnava is "Prema Bhakti", but out of the 5 types of mukti, for sayujya-mukti—we use the pramana “aruhya krccrena param padam tatha, patanty adho anadrta yusmad anghrayah” (Srimad Bhagavatam 10.2.32) to provide evidence that sayuja-mukti is not a permanent type of mukti. If this is the case, why is… Expand>

Question:

The goal of a Gaudiya Vaishnava is "Prema Bhakti", but out of the 5 types of mukti, for sayujya-mukti—we  use the pramana “aruhya krccrena param padam tatha, patanty adho anadrta yusmad anghrayah” (Srimad Bhagavatam 10.2.32) to provide evidence that sayuja-mukti is not a permanent type of mukti. If this is the case, why is it considered one of the types of mukti? My understanding of “mukti” here is based on the definition from Bhagavat 2.10.6 – muktir hitva anyatha rupam svarupena vyavasthitih.

^ Show less

English;

On Worshipping Virgin Mary

May 1, 2016 |

Question: I saw an article on Dandavats.com titled "Parusurama and Virgin mary" [ http://www.dandavats.com/?p=26584 ] This article about Virgin Mary appears to be on more of a sentimental platform conveying the message that you can pray to even Virgin Mary or any demigod to come to Krishna Conciousness. They also have included "portion" of "portion" of one of Srila Prabhupada's correspondence to Sivananda on Virgin Mary to substantiate their "belief".… Expand>

Question:

I saw an article on Dandavats.com titled "Parusurama and Virgin mary" [ http://www.dandavats.com/?p=26584 ]

This article about Virgin Mary appears to be on more of a sentimental platform conveying the message that you can pray to even Virgin Mary or any demigod to come to Krishna Conciousness. They also have included "portion" of "portion" of one of Srila Prabhupada's correspondence to Sivananda on Virgin Mary to substantiate their "belief".

Guru Maharaja, my question is:

1. Is such method of prayer to attain Krishna conciousness valid from the sastric viewpoint?

2. Can we equate such prayers of us to the prayers of Gopis to demigoddess to attain Lord Krishna?

3. In my experience, as this article seems to also indicate, that even after attaining Krishna conciousness, devotees who have attained Krishna Conciousness through such method seems to have attachment to the demigods or virgin mary in the form of affection however mild it might be. Is this still considered okay or pure devotional service to Lord Krishna?

^ Show less

English; Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Realism and Idealism

May 10, 2009 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India

Kamah, Kamapradah, Prabhuh

December 26, 2013 |

English; Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

  • Viṣṇu-sahasranāma 298-300

  • 40 m 48 s  |  18.7 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Damodara-lila in Gopala-campu

October 9, 2014 |

English; Gauragrama, Telangana, India

Who is Called Sadhu and Acarya?

August 23, 2012 |

Question: I have a question regarding His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. Did Srila Prabhupada ever call himself a saint or acarya in any situation? I am asking this because I don't think that I am able to tell who is saint and who is not.

English;

The Fire is Still Burning

September 3, 2006 |

English; Moscow, Russia

Conversation with Kavi Karnapura Dasa Brahmacari

August 20, 2016 |

English; Dublin, Ireland

Are Bhuddhist and Taoist Ashrams Better Than of ISKCON's?

April 4, 2011 |

Question: I am writing to Your Holiness to ask a question about a discussion that I had with a person who knows both ISKCON and eastern paths of philosophy and metaphysics. He was making comparison and criticism. He said for instance that ISKCON temples are a mess, dirty, noisy with lots of fighting amongst devotees… Expand>

Question:

I am writing to Your Holiness to ask a question about a discussion that I had with a person who knows both ISKCON and eastern paths of philosophy and metaphysics. He was making comparison and criticism. He said for instance that ISKCON temples are a mess, dirty, noisy with lots of fighting amongst devotees and budhist, taoist temples are very clean, organized, quiet, peaceful, sattvic. He said that many ISKCON devotees don’t have basic manners, culture, education, etiquette whereas budhist, taoist, astanga yoga practioners are educated, well mannered people. He also said that these people seems to have much more sense control than the devotees. He said that ISKCON doesn’t have organization, planning, structure, stability whereas these groups are very well organized, structured with years, decades, centuries or more of work and tradition. His point is that you judge something or someone by the results and symptoms, so if the devotees are the topmost transcendentalists and if ISKCON and the Sankirtana movement is the most elevated spiritual movement than there should be example, results and symptoms of such superior position. His reasoning is that these eastern paths and their followers seems to be more advanced,self controlled etc. than the devotees. I know his thinking comes from a neophyte understanding but I want to know what I could say to him. Could Your Holiness, tell me what I can say to him?

^ Show less

English;