How Did Sukadeva Become an Impersonalist Even He Knew That Krishna is Supreme?

ASK BVKS | August 2, 2012 |

English;

Question:

How was it possible that Sukadeva Goswami became an impersonalist (Brahmavadi) but then became attracted to Krishna’s personalistic activities?

I ask this because I have heard from senior devotees that Suka is parrot of Radharani and that in his form as a parrot, he heard Bhagavatam from Lord Siva while he was explaining it to Mother Parvathi.

Also Sukadeva Goswami remained in the womb of his mother (Bitika) for around 16 years as he refused to come out. But after Krishna assured him that he will not be attracted by His Maya energy, then he came out. This means that Suka knows Krishna is supreme. Then how did he become an impersonalist.

Audio answer:

Play (4 m 20 s)     Download (4 MB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

Transcendental Anger Management

August 23, 2015 |

English; Crawley, England

Dirty Things in the Mind

August 5, 2014 |

English; Lika, Croatia

Salvation Now

December 25, 2013 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Source and Energy Behind Lord Krsna

June 8, 2011 |

Question: What is the source and energy behind Lord Krishna? And why he will be called the Supreme Personality of Godhead?

English;

Fear Mentality and Love Mentality

March 11, 2012 |

English;

Principles for Establishing Varnasrama Communities, Part-1

April 15, 2015 |

English; Rajpura, Punjab, India

Harinama or Book Distribution

March 4, 2011 |

Question: I am sure you are aware of one of the great devotees in our ISKCON movement, Srila Aindra Prabhu, recently I have heard some of his recordings, lectures, conversations, and he is always giving emphasis on that one of the biggest problems in ISKCON is that the performance of (nagar) Harinama Sankirtan is on… Expand>

Question:

I am sure you are aware of one of the great devotees in our ISKCON movement, Srila Aindra Prabhu, recently I have heard some of his recordings, lectures, conversations, and he is always giving emphasis on that one of the biggest problems in ISKCON is that the performance of (nagar) Harinama Sankirtan is on the decline and that is the reason for many problems in ISKCON. It is now often sidelined and marginalised as a token activity that is performed once in a while. He feels that it is more important than book distribution.

If we look historically at ISKCON, the times when most people joined the movement was when there was ample regular Harinama Sankirtan being performed everyday. Similarly many great saints in our movement were engaged in regular Harinama Sankirtan, such as Vishnujana Swami, etc.

I am also aware that book distribution brhad mrdanga has been promoted as our kirtan by Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur as being equal to Harinama Sankirtan. Book distribution is still emphasised quite nicely in most of our temples in ISKCON.

But often when there was difficulty in ISKCON, lots of kirtan and 24 hour kirtans should be held. Now I see a huge popularity in kirtan in the temples, in Europe and America, regularly large and long kirtans are held, although I still do not see the results fully manifesting yet, I believe it may do soon.

Here are my questions -

Is book distribution a means for replacing (Nagar) Harinama Sankirtan, or that they should both be the main focus of our movement side by side?

Do you feel (Nagar) Harinama Sankirtan should be promoted to regular daily activity, or should it be kept as a weekend activity?

Looking forward to hear your authoritative view on this point.

^ Show less

English;

Deity Pastimes, Part-1

October 22, 2016 |

English; Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Questions and Answers Session, Part-1

November 8, 2015 |

English with తెలుగు translation; Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Insubstantial Niceness

July 17, 2014 |

English with Русский translation; Dobromysh, Tatarstan, Russia

The Implications of Spiritual Knowledge

May 23, 2011 |

English; Dublin, Ireland

Should We Celebrate Birthdays?

July 5, 2011 |

Question: I wish to know whether devotees should celebrate birthday of their children or ones own? Is it traditional or sastric? Should a preacher promote new people to keep kirtan-prasadam on their birthdays? What are the advantages or disadvantages of doing so?

English;

Why Books are the Basis, Part-2

January 16, 2016 |

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Questions About False Ego

March 11, 2012 |

Question: Maharaj, after listening to lectures I could understand that the main cause of our miseries is our ego. I want to know the following. 1. What is the ego? 2. What are the symptoms of the ego? 3. What is the nutrition for the ego? 4. Where does this ego stay? 5. How to… Expand>

Question:

Maharaj, after listening to lectures I could understand that the main cause of our miseries is our ego. I want to know the following.

  1. What is the ego?
  2. What are the symptoms of the ego?
  3. What is the nutrition for the ego?
  4. Where does this ego stay?
  5. How to kill this ego?
  6. How can we divert ego to Lord's service as we try to divert our anger in the service of the Lord?
  7. Does this ego also exist in the spiritual world?
^ Show less

English;

Keeping Srila Prabhupada in the Center

May 14, 2011 |

English; Guruvayur, Kerala, India

Next Life Meditations, Part-1

October 24, 2015 |

English; Nanda Gokulam, Telangana, India

Santa Claus Outfits for Radha-Krsna

December 25, 2012 |

Question: Recently I was shocked to learn that few of ISKCON temples around the globe celebrated Christmas by dressing Sri Sri Radha Krishna deities Santa Claus styled outfits. Is it acceptable to dress the Lord in such a non-traditional style or it is just a speculation?… Expand>

Question:

Recently I was shocked to learn that few of ISKCON temples around the globe celebrated Christmas by dressing Sri Sri Radha Krishna deities Santa Claus styled outfits. Is it acceptable to dress the Lord in such a non-traditional style or it is just a speculation?

 

Answer by HH Bhakti Vikasa Swami:

So, I’ve been informed that some temples in Europe in the Christmas season dress Kṛṣṇa as Santa Claus, and that one temple, ISKCON temple (we are talking about ISKCON temples here), is dressing Kṛṣṇa as Santa Claus. And one temple in India also did this. And what do I think about this? 

Unfortunate…is one word I could use. Nonsense is another.

In one letter Śrīla Prabhupāda was informed that devotees sent some Christmas cards with a picture of Krsna. Śrīla Prabhupāda wrote that we are not for Christmas greetings. In another or several times, Śrīla Prabhupāda also spoke about speculation in Deity worship… So, there may be various reasons given. In India, the reason was given that Christians come to our temple. Well, in that case you can dress Kṛṣṇa as cricket star, maybe the cricket fans would come. Or you can dress Kṛṣṇa like some famous film star, then maybe people interested in movies, they would come. 

But the whole idea…Deity worship is to dress Kṛṣṇa as Rādhā likes Him, and dress Rādhā as Kṛṣṇa likes Her, according to the directions of great ācāryas. Getting mixed up with this Western culture…as far as possible we should try to avoid that. We have our own festivals. Why adopt this Christmas, which is supposed to be a birth of Christ, although they don’t actually know when Christ was born? The main feature of Christmas in the modern world is killing lots of birds, especially turkeys in England, drinking lots of alcohol…

Especially, dressing Deities like this, all I can say is- unfortunate. My saying so won’t stop it going on. There are so many great ācāryas in our movement who are introducing things that none of our previous ācāryas was doing…So, what to say? Whether to laugh or to cry?

^ Show less

English;

Victim of the Mind

August 9, 2016 |

English; Detroit, USA

Statements of Srila Prabhupada That Defy Common Sense

February 8, 2012 |

Question: How do we understand the statements of Srila Prabhupada that defy common sense? My question is not specific to what I could eat to make my body happy, but "how do we understand statements by pure devotees that defy common sense?" One might be able to explain away sentences such as in the purport… Expand>

Question:

How do we understand the statements of Srila Prabhupada that defy common sense?
My question is not specific to what I could eat to make my body happy, but "how do we understand statements by pure devotees that defy common sense?" One might be able to explain away sentences such as in the purport of CC 2.4.169 Srila Prabhupada mentions that, "One should not eat fish or other non-vegetarian food during the month of Kartika. A non-vegetarian diet means fish and meat. Similarly, masura dhal and urad dhal are also considered non-vegetarian. These two dhals contain a great amount of protein, and food rich in protein is considered non-vegetarian," however if you have to give to an intelligent reader they defy common sense. So, then comes the question of hermeneutics. In our parampara, it is not just important to understand the scriptures, but the writings of acaryas such as Srila Prabhupada. I refuse to compromise myself saying that some parts of Srila Prabhupada's writings from which I can't extract sense from should be avoided.

^ Show less

English;

Ohe vaisnava thakura and Gurudev krpa bindu diya

November 27, 2016 |

English; Mayapur, West Bengal, India