Condemn Modern Civilization, But Use Modern Amenities

ASK BVKS | August 29, 2011 |

English;

Question:

My question is that Srila Prabhupad used to blaspheme for all new developments but we are utilizing all the modern items for our day to day use nowadays like — staying in a big building, travelling through airplane, using modern equipments for our health… how we do counteract when people ask that one way you are condemning modern civilization but in other than you are using the modern utilities…

Audio answer:

Play (1 m 55 s)     Download (452.7 KB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

Address at BTG Festival

September 3, 2011 |

English; Sri Rangam, Tamil Nadu, India

Damodarastakam Commentary – Verse 3

November 5, 2010 |

English with తెలుగు translation;

Designations In Devotional Service

October 1, 2011 |

English; Valsad, Gujarat, India

All You Need is Love

August 23, 2015 |

English; Crawley, England

Truth Seekers Who Don't Find It

September 5, 2011 |

English; Valsad, Gujarat, India

Deity Worship, Radhastami

September 18, 1999 |

English;

Who is Called Sadhu and Acarya?

August 23, 2012 |

Question: I have a question regarding His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. Did Srila Prabhupada ever call himself a saint or acarya in any situation? I am asking this because I don't think that I am able to tell who is saint and who is not.

English;

The Money Culture

September 29, 2013 |

English; Coventry, England

Why People Believe What They Do

November 29, 2014 |

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Bhagavad-gita in Two Lines

December 7, 2013 |

English with తెలుగు translation; Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India

Basics of Reincarnation Explained

October 14, 2015 |

English; Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Affectionate Avatars

May 16, 2011 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Guruvayur, Kerala, India

Punishment and Lenience, Part-2

September 18, 2014 |

English; Coventry, England

Krsna is the Best Disciple

February 16, 2014 |

English with தமிழ் translation;

Kalyani and Other Unsung Greats

May 24, 2011 |

English; Dublin, Ireland

Jaya Sri Krsna, Part-1

August 26, 2015 |

English; Inis Rath, Fermanagh, Northern Ireland

Will It Lead to Guru Groupism?

September 27, 2011 |

Question: When the disciples hear some criticism (about another sannyasi), from their spiritual master (especially in a lecture), it may happen that they also develop a critical attitude towards that sannyasi and speak things like “this sannyasi is like this, that sannyasi is like that etc…). Do you think this may promote the ongoing guru groupism even more as the devotees will start thinking that my guru is the best and the rest have faults?

English;

Bhakti is Independent and Supreme, Part-8

March 21, 2016 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

  • Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta 2.10.139

  • 1 h 16 m  |  35 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Guru As Truth Conductor

August 19, 2012 |

English; Cupertino, California, USA

  • Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta 1.1.46

  • 1 h 39 m  |  34.3 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Why Sayujya is Considered As One Kind of Mukti

July 28, 2012 |

Question: The goal of a Gaudiya Vaishnava is "Prema Bhakti", but out of the 5 types of mukti, for sayujya-mukti—we use the pramana “aruhya krccrena param padam tatha, patanty adho anadrta yusmad anghrayah” (Srimad Bhagavatam 10.2.32) to provide evidence that sayuja-mukti is not a permanent type of mukti. If this is the case, why is… Expand>

Question:

The goal of a Gaudiya Vaishnava is "Prema Bhakti", but out of the 5 types of mukti, for sayujya-mukti—we  use the pramana “aruhya krccrena param padam tatha, patanty adho anadrta yusmad anghrayah” (Srimad Bhagavatam 10.2.32) to provide evidence that sayuja-mukti is not a permanent type of mukti. If this is the case, why is it considered one of the types of mukti? My understanding of “mukti” here is based on the definition from Bhagavat 2.10.6 – muktir hitva anyatha rupam svarupena vyavasthitih.

^ Show less

English;