Two colossal considerations

Bhagavad-gītā 7.14 | May 26, 2007 |

English; Naberezhnie Chelni, Russia

Play (39 m 8 s)     Download (17.9 MB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

When Spouse is Not a Devotee

February 12, 2011 |

Question: What to do if husband is new in Krishna consciousness and wife is in bhakti since 3 years, and she can’t convince her husband about no illicit sex? What should she do if her husband is ready to do everything in bhakti but not to have a control in this regard?

English;

Vrsabhaksah, Vrsapriyah

August 24, 2017 |

English; Udupi, Karnataka, India

Elusive Simplicity, Part-1

July 19, 2016 |

English; Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

The Need for Strong Speaking

June 24, 2011 |

English; Chicago, Illinois, USA

Reforming Rascal Indian Civilization

October 21, 2016 |

English; Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Talk to villagers

September 13, 2014 |

English; Bleasby, Nottinghamshire, England

The Importance of Ramayana As It Is

April 5, 2017 |

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Why People Believe What They Do

November 29, 2014 |

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Bhakti is Independent and Supreme, Part-8

March 21, 2016 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

  • Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta 2.10.139

  • 1 h 16 m  |  35 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Krishna's Assuming Forms

August 28, 2012 |

Question: I would like to ask for clarification of one subject, namely, Krishna's "assuming" different forms. In one of the classes that had been uploaded on the bvks.com you spoke about the Lord not "assuming" the form, as far as I remember, you made the point that these forms of the Lord do exist eternally and that… Expand>

Question:

I would like to ask for clarification of one subject, namely, Krishna's "assuming" different forms. In one of the classes that had been uploaded on the bvks.com you spoke about the Lord not "assuming" the form, as far as I remember, you made the point that these forms of the Lord do exist eternally and that the forms of the material world are the "copies" and not the other way round. You also made the point that the word "assume" should probably not be used in the verse.

Today we were listening to the class by Srila Prabhupada and he also spoke on the topic and this is what he said:

"So sometimes this earthly planet was thrown into the water, Garbhodaka-samudra, Garbhodaka Sea, and God took the form of a boar, having two tusks — because it was easier. Just like shovel, you take something like that. So He took the earth. So that is described: ksitir iha vipulatare tisthati tava… No. What is that? Dasana-sikhare? The, this is described in Jayadeva's prayer. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna. Vasati, "is resting"; vasati dasana-sikhare, "on the top of the tusk." Kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa jaya jagadisa hare. So He's yajnesa. It is not that He's… is shape was just like hog, but He's not hog. Don't misunderstand. His shape was a gigantic hog. You can just imagine what kind of hog He was. The shape was like hog, but He was resting the whole planet, earthly planet, on the tusk. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna sasini kalanka, kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa. Here it is stated, saukaram. Saukaram means like hog. Not that He's hog. He's yajnesa. He can take any shape. Just like here is, God has assumed the shape of a lion, half-lion, half-man. So He's all powerful, He can take any shape, any form, but He is not that form. That is for the time being. For the time being, He assumes so many forms. The real form is Krsna, the original form. Kesava dhrta-sukara, sukara-rupa or sukara-rupa. "My Lord Kesava, You have assumed this form." So there are many millions and millions of forms of God. According to time, necessity, circumstances, He assumes different forms. Because it is His business:

yada yada hi dharmasya
glanir bhavati bharata
abhyutthanam adharmasya
tadatmanam srjamy aham
[Bg. 4.7]

He appears as soon as there are discrepancies in the methodical way."

>>> Ref. VedaBase => Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.3.7 — Los Angeles, September 13, 1972

I remember discussing this very same point with Gokula Candra Prabhu when we were in Salem, and the conclusion was that these forms do exist eternally, but from the above statement by Srila Prabhupada it seems to be otherwise. Could you clarify that please so that I may understand this properly?

^ Show less

English;

ISKCON's Basic Teachings

October 18, 2015 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Shall I Allow Muslims to Stay at the Next Door?

May 6, 2011 |

Question: What is our responsibilities to our dharma, our society, our country and our own self? Can we (being a member of ISKCON) allow any other dharma person (say muslim) to live nearby us, as our neighbor, in our property, only because of money he pays? And importance only given to the MONEY? And forget the responsibility to our surroundings, and other neighbours?

English;

Varahadeva and Preaching in Siva-bhumi

February 11, 2014 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Batticaloa, Sri Lanka

Mahamaya, Mahotsaha, Mahabala, Mahabuddhi

September 30, 2012 |

English; Boston, Massachusetts, USA

  • Viṣṇu-sahasranāma 172-175

  • 47 m 19 s  |  21.7 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Clarity in Spiritual Understanding

November 6, 2015 |

English; Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Cakra-Gadhadara

July 16, 2017 |

English; Gauragrama, Telangana, India

Debate – Love, Success, aur Dhoka

April 4, 2015 |

English; Delhi, India

A Discussion on Christianity

December 24, 2017 |

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Dharmakrt - Accusations Against Krsna, Part-1

August 20, 2016 |

English; Inish Rath, Ireland

A Discussion about Bhaktisiddhanta

May 27, 2011 |

English; Karuna Bhavan, Scotland, UK