Democracy, quasi-kings, and corruption

    Posted on June 11, 2017



Русский перевод

In a monarchy, one man sufficiently trained was competent enough to conduct alone the business of the state. But in a democracy no one is trained like a prince; instead, politicians are voted to responsible posts of administration by diplomatic arrangements. In place of one king or supreme executive officer, in a democracy there are so many quasi-kings: the president, the ministers, the deputy ministers, the secretaries, the assistant secretaries, the private secretaries, and the undersecretaries. There are a number of parties — political, social, and communal — and there are party whips, party whims, and so on. But no one is well enough trained to look after the factual interests of the governed. In a so-called democratic government, corruption is even more rampant than in an autocracy or monarchy.

Light of the Bhagavat verse 44

 

See also:

God got Toothache?!
Why we take cow protection seriously
How dictatorship can be good
Understand God in five minutes
Srila Bhaktisiddhanta -- no compromise
Read!
The only ingredient that satisfies
Chanting will purify the demons
Practical instructions for happy civilization
The perfect king
A very simple tapasya
Certainty based on Bhagavad-gita
By Bhagavad-gita we can capture all rascals
Gurukula — we don't follow the government regulations
The cause of all troubles in present society
 

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark