Democracy, quasi-kings, and corruption

    Posted on June 11, 2017



Русский перевод

In a monarchy, one man sufficiently trained was competent enough to conduct alone the business of the state. But in a democracy no one is trained like a prince; instead, politicians are voted to responsible posts of administration by diplomatic arrangements. In place of one king or supreme executive officer, in a democracy there are so many quasi-kings: the president, the ministers, the deputy ministers, the secretaries, the assistant secretaries, the private secretaries, and the undersecretaries. There are a number of parties — political, social, and communal — and there are party whips, party whims, and so on. But no one is well enough trained to look after the factual interests of the governed. In a so-called democratic government, corruption is even more rampant than in an autocracy or monarchy.

Light of the Bhagavat verse 44

 

See also:

Why people in India have lost their own culture
Our test tube
Krsna will protect even in hell
Ignite fire and pour water
Nothing remains unachieved
Devotees dancing like jubilant peacocks
Cut the head of the Mayavadi
Why the problems of the world are becoming very serious and grave
If one can remain a brahmacari all through, that is a great benefit
We cannot change our policy
Subtle sex — spit, or remain in the same hellish condition
Why people worship Siva and not Krsna
Four principles of four kinds of people
Be divine, not a devil
Srila Prabhupada requests all disciples to develop farm projects
 

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark